ActiveSync 4: why COM interfaces ?

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Diego Novati - 30 Sep 2005 10:31 GMT

Hi,
I've just downloaded ActiveSync 4 and I expected to find the possibility to
program ActiveSync with .NET and C#.
Why Microsoft doesn't use .NET technology but is still using COM ?
Do I have to believe that Microsoft developers doesn't believe in .NET ?

Thanks

Diego Novati

Reply to this Message

Chris De Herrera - 30 Sep 2005 22:39 GMT

Hi,
I do not know why. I suggest that you ask the folks in the
microsoft.public.pocketpc.developer group since they would know more about
what you can and can't do with the Compact .NET framework.

Signature

Chris De Herrera
http://www.pocketpcfaq.com
http://www.tabletpctalk.com
http://www.pocketpctalk.com
http://www.mobilitytalk.com

> Hi,
> I've just downloaded ActiveSync 4 and I expected to find the possibility
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Diego Novati

Reply to this Message