Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
End Users
Pocket PCActiveSyncMultimediaEBooksWirelessSmartPhones
Developers
Windows MobileSmartPhonesWinCE ProgrammingVB for WinCEVC++ for WinCEPlatform BuilderTest Tools
PocketPC DirectoryFree SoftwareWeb Resources
Related Topics
PalmMobile PhonesMore Topics ...

Pocket PC Forum / End Users / Wireless / October 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

802.1x and HP iPAQ 210 WM6

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jeff - 08 Sep 2008 00:48 GMT
Hi,

We are currently attempting to deploy some new iPAQ 210 mobile devices running Windows Mobile 6 Classic, and would like to setup secure wireless to the corporate WLAN.  We have 802.1x currently in place with a Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Root CA.  We are rather new to the PDA wireless encryption technology, and would like the devices to be on the WLAN without prompting the users for authentication (instead have a power on password).  We have successfully implemented PEAP technology on them, but would like to issue a device certificate to them so they will not prompt for authentication if possible.  The PEAP implementation seemed to be a little buggy since it would sometimes authenticate and sometimes would not, which is a problem for the end users.  After two or three tries it would always work, but it did not seem to be a reliable solution.  Also, after a soft reset the devices would prompt for authentication once again.  Notebook users do not have any problem authenticating to the WLAN so the infrastructure seems to be sound.  Using Certificates, the devices prompt for a username and domain, but no password.  They are also prompting for this it seems at random stages after powering them off and on or after a soft reset.

Would someone with a little experience with this technology care to make some recommendations in regards to the best way to achieve this?  Would configuring a new SSID and WPA-PSK be a better solution for the very limited number of PDA that will be participating on the wireless network (right now 2, soon to be perhaps close to 10 in a month or two)?

Thank you,
Jeff
queisser - 15 Sep 2008 20:55 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Thank you,
> Jeff

If you're comfortable having the devices connect to the WLAN without
prompting for passwords then WPA-PSK would give you a reasonable path
as long as you make your passphrases strong or don't use passphrases
but go straight to random keys. I've connected my iPaq to a 802.1x
test network running a FreeRadius server and, if I remember correctly,
was able to connect without additional passwords. I was using EAP-TLS
for my experiment and had the client certificate on the iPaq.

Is your main concern encryption or authentication?

Andrew
Jeff - 08 Oct 2008 06:20 GMT
Thanks for the reply,

My main concern would be encryption strength  We did end up going with
WPA-PSK and it seems to be working fine and gives us the compatibility we
need.  It seemed that using every Windows Server 2008 option and
certificates we were always prompted for some set of credentials at random.
Since both Windows Server 2008 is new to market as well as the PDA product,
we decided to go with the best compatibilty route.

Thanks,
Jeff

On Sep 7, 4:48 pm, "Jeff" <u...@domain.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Thank you,
> Jeff

If you're comfortable having the devices connect to the WLAN without
prompting for passwords then WPA-PSK would give you a reasonable path
as long as you make your passphrases strong or don't use passphrases
but go straight to random keys. I've connected my iPaq to a 802.1x
test network running a FreeRadius server and, if I remember correctly,
was able to connect without additional passwords. I was using EAP-TLS
for my experiment and had the client certificate on the iPaq.

Is your main concern encryption or authentication?

Andrew
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.