hi!
I tried to run Two card Network card test on WinCE 5.0.
I am testing my wireless network card and
I am working on a CEPC (x86) based platform.
My wilress network card is SDIO based (I am using PCI based SD host
controller to connect).
I am running Two Card Network Test on Two machines.
and the test case fails by giving
ndt_2c ERROR: Should have received 300 packets but get 0
The script is failing to recognize the packets from my interface.
Two card test on Two machines are configured as:
VMINI1 : 192.168.2.55
My Test Adapter : 192.168.3.55
VMINI2 : 192.168.2.66
My Support Adapter : 192.168.3.66
Check the subnets. I am using different subnets for VMINI and
Adapters.
I monitored the wireless traffic.
My test adapter is sending the Packets to support Adapter and Support
Adapter is receiving the packets and Indicating those packets to OS.
But still test case fails by saying
ndt_2c ERROR: Should have received 300 packets but get 0
Can any one tell me why this is happening.
Your help is highly appreciated.
Note:
but when i am using support card as pci lan card then send path of the
test
case passed.
This is my log:
so Is it that
Two card network card got some issues with wireless
Adapters????????????????????????????
My log message...
c3f2ebd2: ndt_2c Msg: Querying if test miniport is wireless
c3f2ebd2: ndt_2c Msg: Miniport RWLPSDIO1 is ** Wireless-LAN **
<TESTGROUP>
*** ==================================================================
*** SUITE INFORMATION
***
*** Suite Name: N/A (built on the fly)
*** Suite Description: N/A
*** Number of Tests: 1
*** ==================================================================
*** ==================================================================
*** SYSTEM INFORMATION
***
*** Date and Time: 09/29/2008 9:14 PM (Monday)
***
*** Device Name: CEPCDL30951
***
*** OS Version: 5.0
*** Build Number: 1400
*** Platform ID: 3 "Windows CE"
*** Version String: ""
***
*** Processor Type: 0x000002AE (686) "Intel Pentium II"
*** Processor Architecture: 0x0000 (0) "Intel"
*** Page Size: 0x00001000 (4,096)
*** Minimum App Address: 0x00010000 (65,536)
*** Maximum App Address: 0x7FFFFFFF (2,147,483,647)
*** Active Processor Mask: 0x00000001
*** Number Of Processors: 1
*** Allocation Granularity: 0x00010000 (65,536)
*** Processor Level: 0x0008 (8)
*** Processor Revision: 0x0001 (1)
*** ==================================================================
*** ==================================================================
*** MEMORY INFO
***
*** Memory Total: 26,025,984 bytes
*** Memory Used: 5,726,208 bytes
*** Memory Free: 20,299,776 bytes
***
*** Kernel Used: 577,536 bytes
*** Water Mark: 4,953 pages
***
*** Store Total: 25,952,256 bytes
*** Store Used: 1,103,792 bytes
*** Store Free: 24,848,464 bytes
*** ==================================================================
BEGIN GROUP: ndt_2c.dll
<TESTCASE ID=1>
*** vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
*** TEST STARTING
***
*** Test Name: 2c_SendPackets
*** Test ID: 1
*** Library Path: \ndt_2c.dll
*** Command Line: -t RWLPSDIO1 -s RWLPSD...@192.168.2.55
*** Random Seed: 14472
*** Thread Count: 0
*** vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
BEGIN TEST: "2c_SendPackets", Threads=0, Seed=14472
c3f2ebd2: ndt_2c Msg: Start 2c_SendPackets test
c3f2ebd2: ndt_2c Msg: The test adapter is RWLPSDIO1
c3f2ebd2: ndt_2c Msg: The support adapter is
RWLPSD...@192.168.2.55
c3f2ebd2: ndt_2c Msg: Opening adapters
c3f2ebd2: ndt_2c Msg: Binding adapters
c3f2ebd2: ndt_2c Msg: Get basic adapters info
c3f2ebd2: ndt_2c Msg: Set adapter filters
c3f2ebd2: ndt_2c Msg: Sending 300 packets with size 64 bytes to
1 addresses
c3f2ebd2: ndt_2c Msg: Sent 300 packets
c3f2ebd2: ndt_2c Msg: Stop receiving and checking results
c3f2ebd2: ndt_2c ERROR: Should have received 300 packets but get
0 packets
END TEST: "2c_SendPackets", FAILED, Time=65.824
*** ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
*** TEST COMPLETED
***
*** Test Name: 2c_SendPackets
*** Test ID: 1
*** Library Path: \ndt_2c.dll
*** Command Line: -t RWLPSDIO1 -s RWLPSD...@192.168.2.55
*** Result: Failed
*** Random Seed: 14472
*** Thread Count: 1
*** Execution Time: 0:01:05.824
*** ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
</TESTCASE RESULT="FAILED">
END GROUP: ndt_2c.dll
*** ==================================================================
*** MEMORY INFO
***
*** Memory Total: 26,025,984 bytes
*** Memory Used: 5,701,632 bytes
*** Memory Free: 20,324,352 bytes
***
*** Kernel Used: 581,632 bytes
*** Water Mark: 4,946 pages
***
*** Store Total: 25,952,256 bytes
*** Store Used: 1,103,792 bytes
*** Store Free: 24,848,464 bytes
*** ==================================================================
*** ==================================================================
*** SUITE SUMMARY
***
*** Passed: 0
*** Failed: 1
*** Skipped: 0
*** Aborted: 0
*** -------- ---------
*** Total: 1
***
*** Cumulative Test Execution Time: 0:01:05.824
*** Total Tux Suite Execution Time: 0:01:15.463
*** CPU Idle Time: 0:01:15.311
*** ==================================================================
</TESTGROUP>
@@@@@@1
Michel Verhagen (eMVP) - 03 Oct 2008 00:09 GMT
I see you already did post it here. Please don't post the same question
to multiple NG's. Please read:
http://guruce.com/blogpost/howtoaskquestionsonnewsgroups
Good luck,
Michel Verhagen, eMVP
Check out my blog: http://GuruCE.com/blog
GuruCE
Microsoft Embedded Partner
http://GuruCE.com
Consultancy, training and development services.
> hi!
> I tried to run Two card Network card test on WinCE 5.0.
[quoted text clipped - 168 lines]
> </TESTGROUP>
> @@@@@@1
Raghu - 03 Oct 2008 06:25 GMT
Thanks for the Info Michel.
Actually i wan't to post the same question to multiple Ng's
but did it separately.
Next time Will do the same as mentioned in the ink.
Thanks.
Raghu - 06 Oct 2008 08:20 GMT
I didn't find the solution ....
Tried to google it but no use....
The below link talks about my issue bu there is no solution....
http://www.tech-archive.net/Archive/WindowsCE/microsoft.public.windowsce.platbui
lder/2005-08/msg00291.html
Can some one please update on this?????
Thanks......