| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Is the DirectDraw test running using exclusive mode? | 24 Oct 2005 21:58 GMT | 1 |
In the October 13 documentation, under the section: Windows Mobile-based Device Features > Graphics and Multimedia Technologies
> Graphics > DirectDraw > DirectDraw Migration > Migrating DirectDraw Flags It indicates that:
|
| In CETK, How to caculate the total duration from the test LOG file | 19 Oct 2005 02:09 GMT | 3 |
Dear, How to caculate the total duration of one single test case from the log file? At the bottom of the LOG file, there several lines like this : *** Cumulative Test Execution Time: 0:32:45.037
|
| Graphics Device Interface Performance Test | 17 Oct 2005 23:45 GMT | 2 |
CETK5.0 Graphics Device Interface Performance Test Failed. But it does not mention any reasons for the fail in the log file "Graphics_Device_Interface_Performance_Test.log". Is that correct?
|
| ActivateDevice test in TuxDll | 14 Oct 2005 09:28 GMT | 7 |
I have a TESTPROCAPI ActivateDevice test in my TuxDll but it fails as my I2C driver which i am testing has already been loaded as its a built in device. I've stepped through code to see where it fails in devload.c. Does one not normally test ActivateDevice in a TuxHarness. I was ...
|
| Kato log server | 12 Oct 2005 18:23 GMT | 1 |
I'm developing a test environment for a device running Windows CE and a very- nice-to-have feature would be that the (controlling part of the) test environment could restart an entire test in case the test crashed. I contemplated on using the
|
| Remote Display Control | 11 Oct 2005 00:11 GMT | 2 |
I've run Remote Display Control for Pocket PC. Now I'm looking for the cab file to install the client on a Windows CE 4.1 or 4.2 device. Does anyone know where I can get that? Thanks.
|
| CETK5.0 DirectDraw Test #500 to #520. | 08 Oct 2005 00:59 GMT | 1 |
CETK5.0 DirectDraw Test #500 to #520 aborted. However, if run the single test from #500 to #520, it either passed or skipped. Is it a known issue? are the above tests aborted acceptable for submitting the log?
|
| "/disk" parameter for DISKTEST ignored? | 04 Oct 2005 22:28 GMT | 6 |
I've been wanting to run the CETK Storage Device Block Driver API test against a USB device that gets multiple DSKn: descriptors opened for it when the device is plugged in. However, when I enter the command
|
| Another File System Driver test bug | 04 Oct 2005 21:42 GMT | 1 |
Running windows CE .NET Test Kit v 4.2 service packed to Q2 2005 Picked this one up when running StorageDevice\File System Driver test 5027 on a 128 MB compact flash card with two partitions test invokes CMtdPart::FillDiskMinusXBytesWithSetEndOfFile() method in
|