| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| CETK GDI test with 16bits555 | 31 Jan 2006 18:21 GMT | 7 |
I'm trying to pass the GDTI tests for my device. I use a 240*320*16 screen with 16bits555. All the tests failed when I used the default command line with this kind of error :
|
| CETK GDI test 1100 | 31 Jan 2006 10:35 GMT | 4 |
I'm trying to pass the GDI Test, under WinCE 5.0 with a 240*320. The test 1100 fails with this error : *** vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv *** TEST STARTING
|
| urgent::Test Drivers not included in CETK | 31 Jan 2006 06:46 GMT | 3 |
I want to test certain Drivers whose test cases are not available in CETK (Digital camera, etc ).can somebody tell me what approach Microsoft recomends to test such driver so that they can be Microsoft Certified Answer ASAP
|
| Format of results files. | 30 Jan 2006 16:42 GMT | 1 |
In the result files that CETK generates automatically how can I modify the suite name and suite description? *** Suite Name: N/A (built on the fly) *** Suite Description: N/A
|
| NSTL Enviroment? | 19 Jan 2006 13:07 GMT | 3 |
Is there some documentations about NSTL testing enviroment? We would like to try to mimic the enviroment so that we can get similiar or as close as possible results.
|
| ddraw test problem because of clientside.exe | 16 Jan 2006 21:02 GMT | 1 |
My CETK DDraw test is failing when I run it using activesync, the test used to pass when I run it directly through the device(copy it to SD). I think the reason is because clientside is updating the framebuffer which is conflicting with the DDraw frame buffer, the test which is ...
|
| Question about driver validation | 16 Jan 2006 21:01 GMT | 2 |
Hi Gurus, I have a question about validating my device driver. If my driver has passed the cetk test cases,and Microsoft has listed my driver in its webpage. But I make an update to my driver and
|
| Appverifce problem !! | 13 Jan 2006 22:34 GMT | 2 |
I have launched Appverifce.exe on the desktop. but after I try to connect, the Appverifce blocked as cpu 99% usage. my device is mobile 5.0 and Desktop OS is XP. tell me about that what is this problem ? and how to solve ?
|
| Is it a BUG for CETK tests? | 12 Jan 2006 06:43 GMT | 7 |
Is it a BUG for CETK tests? Windows CE 5.0 In CETK tests, ->"Graphics Device Interface Test ", -> 218. there is one function "BitBltSuiteFullscreen function" in 218 test case.
|
| What about case 4016 of storage device block driver API test? | 12 Jan 2006 01:21 GMT | 1 |
I didn't read any discription about test case 4016 in block driver API test in WinCE4.2 CETK document? What about this case? My driver passed all the other cases in block driver API test, but
|
| Windows CE 5.0 Test Kit | 08 Jan 2006 16:44 GMT | 2 |
Can I use the AppVerifier in this test kit to test applications running on a Windows Mobile 5 Pocket PC device or emulator? I have Visual Studio 2005 and the Device Emulator. How do I use the test kit with these products?
|
| Application testing for Windows Mobile 5 | 05 Jan 2006 18:06 GMT | 3 |
What testing tools are available for Windows Mobile 5 based applications? I am particularly interested in memory leak detection and performance tools. (I do not have platform builder.) Thanks,
|
| CE.NET Emulator | 04 Jan 2006 16:58 GMT | 1 |
We supply rugged Tablet PCs running XP Pro and XP Embedded. We have a partner that has developed an application running under CE.NET (on a tablet style computer) but would like to use our hardware and not re-write the software.
|
| DCR: Application Verifier does not track ImageList_LoadImage leak in shim_usergdi.dll | 02 Jan 2006 17:48 GMT | 1 |
When you don't call ImageList_Destroy() on a handle returned from ImageList_LoadImage() or ImageList_LoadBitmap(), you get a small little message in the debugger which says "APPLICATION ERROR: Exited with Image List not destroyed". I think Application Verifier should detect this ...
|