Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
End Users
Pocket PCActiveSyncMultimediaEBooksWirelessSmartPhones
Developers
Windows MobileSmartPhonesWinCE ProgrammingVB for WinCEVC++ for WinCEPlatform BuilderTest Tools
PocketPC DirectoryFree SoftwareWeb Resources
Related Topics
PalmMobile PhonesMore Topics ...

Pocket PC Forum / Developers / Test Tools / June 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
CETK Graphics Device Interface Test case 231<AlphaBlend> failed always26 Jun 2008 11:32 GMT2
My BSP is based on ARMV4I, the test results are shown as below, but my
emulator version(X86) can pass this case, could anyone give some
suggestion on how to debug it? Thanks
        AlphaBlend - AlphaBlendConstAlphaTest
Setting breakpoints in the CETK source code23 Jun 2008 09:00 GMT1
While debugging the CETK tests, I followed the steps as mentioned in -
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa462519.aspx
However, whenever I set a breakpoint at the entry and exit point of a
function in the CETK source code, the breakpoint does not get
GTC Verify GetIdletime22 Jun 2008 01:30 GMT1
while I test the function, the message i got as following. i found the
"OEMIdle" never be called after cetk start. so how can i solve this
problem?
745402 PID:30f001e TID:310001e       INFO: Sleep time: 325  gtc
WinCE BSP certification06 Jun 2008 23:13 GMT2
We have developed WinCE 5.0 and WinCE 6.0 BSP on our ARM platform board and
want to get cirtification from MS.
I visit the "Windows Embedded CE BSP and CPU Certification Program" (
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/embedded/aa714500.aspx) page on MSDN, but
About clientside disconnect problem06 Jun 2008 23:11 GMT1
I would test power down and power up functions by CETK.
The ethernet will be re-connection with platform manage when functions
working.
Platform manage will transfer TCP retransmission packets to clientside
OAL Timer Test 121 disconnects03 Jun 2008 19:40 GMT3
CETK disconnects while running the OAL Timer Test with the following
parameters -
tux -o -d oalTest.dll -x 121.
Can this be expected behaviour under any circumstances or is it
link02 Jun 2008 16:28 GMT1
http://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2007-081617-4608-99&
tabid=3

Signature

Regards
p.mc

tezzer01 Jun 2008 21:33 GMT2
rooney
Signature

Regards
p.mc

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.